WHAT IF THE LANDLORD DIDN’T PROTECT THE DEPOSIT BEFORE SECTION 21?

What If the Landlord Didn’t Protect the Deposit Before Section 21?

What If the Landlord Didn’t Protect the Deposit Before Section 21?

Blog Article

In the world of renting, both landlords and tenants have rights and responsibilities. One of the most common methods a landlord might use to regain possession of their property is through a Section 21 eviction notice. However, the validity of such a notice is heavily dependent on whether the landlord followed the correct legal procedures—including protecting the tenant's deposit.



Deposit Protection: A Legal Requirement


In England and Wales, landlords are legally required to protect a tenant’s deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme (TDP) within 30 days of receiving it. They must also provide the tenant with key information about where and how the deposit is protected.


If the landlord fails to do this, they may not be able to serve a valid Section 21 notice to begin the eviction process. Courts have thrown out Section 21 notices due to unprotected deposits, often delaying or even preventing eviction altogether.



Consequences for the Landlord


If a landlord did not protect the deposit properly, they must return it to the tenant in full (or with agreed deductions) before serving a Section 21 notice. Only then can they legally proceed with the eviction process using this method.


Tenants can also take landlords to court over unprotected deposits. If the court finds the landlord failed in their duty, it can order the landlord to pay the tenant up to three times the amount of the original deposit as compensation.



Can the Landlord Use Section 8 Instead?


If a landlord cannot use Section 21 due to issues like an unprotected deposit, they might consider using a Section 8 notice instead. This type of notice is based on specific Section 8 notice grounds, such as rent arrears, damage to the property, or antisocial behavior.


However, unlike Section 21, which is a "no-fault" eviction route, Section 8 requires the landlord to prove the grounds for eviction in court. This process can be longer and more complicated, especially if the tenant disputes the claims.



What About Rent Increases Under Section 13?


Another legal tool landlords sometimes use is a Section 13 notice, which allows them to increase rent in a periodic tenancy. It's important to note that using a Section 13 notice doesn’t affect the landlord's ability to evict using Section 8 or Section 21—provided they’ve complied with all relevant laws, including deposit protection.


However, attempting a rent increase while failing to protect a deposit could backfire. It may highlight the landlord’s non-compliance and strengthen the tenant's position if the matter goes to court.



Final Thoughts


For landlords, skipping or forgetting deposit protection might seem like a small oversight—but it can completely derail an eviction process. Whether using a Section 21 eviction notice, a Section 8 notice, or considering a rent increase via Section 13, legal compliance is key.


Tenants, on the other hand, should be aware of their rights. If you’ve received an eviction notice and suspect your deposit wasn’t protected, you might have a strong case to challenge it.


Report this page